The Politics of Regulatory Change: National Forest Management Planning under Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.
This paper examines regulatory change from the William J. Clinton administration through the presidency of George W. Bush by focusing on their respective efforts to alter national forest planning procedures mandated by the National Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA). While rule making has become a...
| Publicado en: | Review of Policy Research Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 37 - 52 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
January 2008
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510744244&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510744244 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 1541132X MJJ jtl: Review of Policy Research issn: 1541132X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: January 2008 vid: 25 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 510744244 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00308.x ppf: 37 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 104KB tig: atl: The Politics of Regulatory Change: National Forest Management Planning under Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. aug: au: Davis, Charles su: Bush, George W. (George Walker), 1946- Clinton, Bill, 1946- Decision making in environmental policy Forest management Decision making United States sug: subj: United States Decision making in environmental policy Forest management Decision making Bush, George W. (George Walker), 1946- Clinton, Bill, 1946- keyword: National Forest Management Act of 1976 ab: This paper examines regulatory change from the William J. Clinton administration through the presidency of George W. Bush by focusing on their respective efforts to alter national forest planning procedures mandated by the National Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA). While rule making has become an important alternative pathway for making policy, the strategies used to develop a new rule may vary among presidents because of differing values and management styles. Both presidents were adept at framing the planning regulation to reflect dominant values such as preserving ecosystems (Clinton) or administrative efficiency (Bush). Between-administration differences in regulatory tactics also tended to alter the relative importance of institutional venues and, by extension, the influence exercised by differing political constituencies. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|