Assessing the Performance of Voluntary Environmental Programs: Does Certification Matter?

The promotion of voluntary environmental programs (VEPs) as alternative approaches to traditional environmental regulation has fueled numerous researchers to evaluate VEP performance. However, these studies have focused on-assessing the environmental performance of a single VEP. As yet, we know litt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Policy Studies Journal Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 95 - 118
Autores principales: Darnall, Nicole, Sides, Stephen
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell February 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510755901&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510755901
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0190292X
        PSJ
      jtl: Policy Studies Journal
      issn: 0190292X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: February 2008
      vid: 36
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510755901
        10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00255.x
      ppf: 95
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.4MB
      tig:
        atl: Assessing the Performance of Voluntary Environmental Programs: Does Certification Matter?
      aug:
        au:
          Darnall, Nicole
          Sides, Stephen
      su:
        ISO 14000 Series Standards
        Business
        Self regulation
        Environmental monitoring
      sug:
        subj:
          ISO 14000 Series Standards
          Business
          Self regulation
          Environmental monitoring
      keyword: Self regulation in business and industry
      ab: The promotion of voluntary environmental programs (VEPs) as alternative approaches to traditional environmental regulation has fueled numerous researchers to evaluate VEP performance. However, these studies have focused on-assessing the environmental performance of a single VEP. As yet, we know little about the overall environmental benefits of these programs. Moreover, questions remain about whether VEPs designed with different monitoring regimes—related to whether programs are self-monitored or undergo external certification—vary in their ability to improve environmental conditions. Using meta-analysis methodology, this article evaluates the aggregated environmental outcomes of U.S. VEPs drawing on data from nine studies and over 30,000 firms. We show that collectively VEP participants do not improve their environmental performance over nonparticipants. Rather, nonparticipants improve their environmental performance by 7.7 percent more than VEP participants. Additionally, nonparticipants improve the environment 24 percent more than participants in self-monitored VEPs, whereas participants in International Standards Organization 14001 as a group exhibit inconclusive environmental performance improvements. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N