Liberal and Illiberal Democracy in Latin America.

This article examines the incidence of liberal and “illiberal” democracy in Latin America from 1978 through 2004. It demonstrates, first, that illiberal democracy—which combines free and fair elections with systematic constraints on citizens' rights—became the norm throughout the region. Second, it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Latin American Politics & Society Vol. 50; no. 1; pp. 31 - 58
Autores principales: Smith, Peter H., Ziegler, Melissa R.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Spring 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510794617&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510794617
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1531426X
        FSZ
      jtl: Latin American Politics & Society
      issn: 1531426X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring 2008
      vid: 50
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510794617
        10.1111/j.1548-2456.2008.00003.x
      ppf: 31
      ppct: 27
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.3MB
      tig:
        atl: Liberal and Illiberal Democracy in Latin America.
      aug:
        au:
          Smith, Peter H.
          Ziegler, Melissa R.
      su:
        Democratization
        Liberalism
        Civil rights
        Latin America
      sug:
        subj:
          Latin America
          Democratization
          Liberalism
          Civil rights
      ab: This article examines the incidence of liberal and “illiberal” democracy in Latin America from 1978 through 2004. It demonstrates, first, that illiberal democracy—which combines free and fair elections with systematic constraints on citizens' rights—became the norm throughout the region. Second, it shows that regime transitions most often ended not in liberal democracy but in illiberal democracy. Third, rare events logit analysis reveals that two variables, hyperinflation and presidential elections, had significant impact on movement toward fuller democracy. As a form of short-term economic shock, hyperinflation generates widespread discontent; given the opportunity to vote, citizens elect reformist opposition candidates who, once in office, remove controls on civil liberties. This scenario substantially increases the likelihood of transition from illiberal to liberal democracy. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N