College Students' Awareness of Irrational Judgments on Gambling Tasks: A Dual-Process Account.
In 2 studies, the authors examined college students' awareness of irrational judgments on gambling tasks. Participants could express a preference between 2 gambles with equivalent ratios (1:10 vs. 10:100) for Study 1 or no preference for Study 2. Participants also rated their certainty that each res...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Psychology Vol. 143; no. 3; pp. 293 - 318 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
May 2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510799140&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510799140 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00223980 JPY jtl: Journal of Psychology issn: 00223980 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May 2009 vid: 143 iid: 3 pid: 58221 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 510799140 10.3200/JRLP.143.3.293-317 ppf: 293 ppct: 25 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.4MB tig: atl: College Students' Awareness of Irrational Judgments on Gambling Tasks: A Dual-Process Account. aug: au: Amsel, Eric Close, Jason Sadler, Eric Klaczynski, Paul A. su: Gambler psychology Psychology of college students Judgment (Psychology) sug: subj: Gambler psychology Psychology of college students Judgment (Psychology) ab: In 2 studies, the authors examined college students' awareness of irrational judgments on gambling tasks. Participants could express a preference between 2 gambles with equivalent ratios (1:10 vs. 10:100) for Study 1 or no preference for Study 2. Participants also rated their certainty that each response option (i.e., 1:10, 10:100, no preference) was rational (analytically based processing) or irrational (experientially based processing of the ratio information). Only a minority of participants in each study was certain that the only analytically based, rational response was no preference. Those participants who were unaware of the analytically based rational response engaged in more formal and informal gambling activities in comparison with others. The authors interpreted the results as evidence of the importance of regulating dual analytical and experiential processes on gambling-related decision making and behavior. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|