Public employment agencies and unemployment spells: reconciling the experimental and nonexperimental evidence.

Econometric evidence strongly suggests that unemployed job-seekers who use the services of a Public Employment Agency (PEA) have longer unemployment spells than those choosing alternative search methods. Yet, in some well-designed U.S. experiments, increased use of PEA services has been associated w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Industrial & Labor Relations Review Vol. 50; pp. 667 - 684
Autor principal: Thomas, Jonathan M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cornell University July 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510836597&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510836597
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00197939
        ILR
      jtl: Industrial & Labor Relations Review
      issn: 00197939
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: July 1997
      vid: 50
      pid: 140
      pub: Cornell University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510836597
        10.2307/2525268
      ppf: 667
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Public employment agencies and unemployment spells: reconciling the experimental and nonexperimental evidence.
      aug:
        au: Thomas, Jonathan M.
      su:
        Employment agencies
        Employment
        Search theory
        United Kingdom
      sug:
        subj:
          United Kingdom
          Employment agencies
          Employment
          Search theory
      keyword: Search theory (Employment)
      ab: Econometric evidence strongly suggests that unemployed job-seekers who use the services of a Public Employment Agency (PEA) have longer unemployment spells than those choosing alternative search methods. Yet, in some well-designed U.S. experiments, increased use of PEA services has been associated with faster transitions into jobs. The author argues that the nonexperimental studies may be biased toward finding a positive relationship between unemployment spell duration and PEA use because they ignore the possibility that PEAs are chosen by many job-seekers only after other search methods have been tried unsuccessfully and a period of unemployment has elapsed. An analysis of U.K. survey data with information on the timing of PEA use in 1987-88 supports that hypothesis. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N