Will free speech get tangled in the Net?

The Supreme Court overturned the Communications Decency Act in summer 1997, but there are now a host of more limited efforts afoot to cut back the range of Internet content and to limit access to various kinds of online material, and these new forms of control pose more subtle and incremental threat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Prospect no. 36; pp. 46 - 51
Autor principal: Marshall, Joshua Micah
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Prospect January/February 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510874923&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510874923
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10497285
        ANP
      jtl: American Prospect
      issn: 10497285
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: January/February 1998
      iid: 36
      pid: 2396
      pub: American Prospect
    artinfo:
      ui: 510874923
      ppf: 46
      ppct: 5
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Will free speech get tangled in the Net?
      aug:
        au: Marshall, Joshua Micah
      su:
        Internet laws
        Freedom of speech
        Platform for Internet Content Selection
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Internet laws
          Freedom of speech
          Platform for Internet Content Selection
      ab: The Supreme Court overturned the Communications Decency Act in summer 1997, but there are now a host of more limited efforts afoot to cut back the range of Internet content and to limit access to various kinds of online material, and these new forms of control pose more subtle and incremental threats to free speech. This fact should force people to confront whether keeping the government out of censorship will be adequate to guarantee freedom online. The myopic focus on government as the singular or most important threat to free speech lies in a basic misreading of American history. The real pointed threats to free speech and free expression do not, and never have, come from government. Rather, they have always come from willful majorities determined on bullying dissenters into silence. The problem with the new information technology and content filtering is that they make this bullying even more feasible than it has been in the past. Content filtering and the Platform for Internet Content Selection used to regulate online information are discussed.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N