Drawing Statistical Inferences from Historical Census Data, 1850-1950.

Virtually all quantitative microdata used by social scientists derive from samples that incorporate clustering, stratification, and weighting adjustments (Kish 1965, 1992). Such data can yield standard error estimates that differ dramatically from those derived from a simple random sample of the sam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Demography Vol. 46; no. 3; pp. 589 - 604
Autores principales: Davern, Michael, Ruggles, Steven, Swenson, Tami, Alexander, J. Trent, Oakes, J. Michael
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Science & Business Media B.V. August 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510879133&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510879133
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00703370
        DEM
      jtl: Demography
      issn: 00703370
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: August 2009
      vid: 46
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510879133
        10.1353/dem.0.0062
      ppf: 589
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 3.6MB
      tig:
        atl: Drawing Statistical Inferences from Historical Census Data, 1850-1950.
      aug:
        au:
          Davern, Michael
          Ruggles, Steven
          Swenson, Tami
          Alexander, J. Trent
          Oakes, J. Michael
      su:
        History of the United States census
        Probability theory
        Error analysis in mathematics
      sug:
        subj:
          History of the United States census
          Probability theory
          Error analysis in mathematics
      ab: Virtually all quantitative microdata used by social scientists derive from samples that incorporate clustering, stratification, and weighting adjustments (Kish 1965, 1992). Such data can yield standard error estimates that differ dramatically from those derived from a simple random sample of the same size. Researchers using historical U.S. census microdata, however, usually apply methods designed for simple random samples. The resulting p values and confidence intervals could be inaccurate and could lead to erroneous research conclusions. Because U.S. census microdata samples are among the most widely used sources for social science and policy research, the need for reliable standard error estimation is critical. We evaluate the historical microdata samples of the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) project from 1850 to 1950 in order to determine (1) the impact of sample design on standard error estimates, and (2) how to apply modern standard error estimation software to historical census samples. We exploit a unique new data source from the 1880 census to validate our methods for standard error estimation, and then we apply this approach to the 1850-1870 and 1900-1950 decennial censuses. We conclude that Taylor series estimation can be used effectively with the historical decennial census microdata samples and should be applied in research analyses that have the potential for substantial clustering effects. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N