Capitalism, Socialism, and “the Middle Way”: A Taxonomy.
The writers seek to conceptualize the “middle way” between bureaucratically planned socialism and industrial capitalism. They accept the Heilbroner-Boettke framework of market-versus-command economies and classify in a neutral fashion the range of terms that have been used by political scientists t...
| Publicado en: | Independent Review Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 71 - 88 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Independent Institute
Summer 2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | The writers seek to conceptualize the “middle way” between bureaucratically planned socialism and industrial capitalism. They accept the Heilbroner-Boettke framework of market-versus-command economies and classify in a neutral fashion the range of terms that have been used by political scientists to describe the middle way. They propose that “the third way” is the most neutral description for the system of nominally private ownership and public control. |
|---|