A Classical-Liberal Response to the Crisis of Bioethics.

The writer discusses the the crises of purpose, principles, expectations, and authority that face modern bioethics and offers a response based on the debate in classical-liberal thought on how to limit power. The writer outlines the ways in which biomedical and governmental power resemble each othe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Independent Review Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 53 - 71
Autor principal: Hall, Lauren K.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Independent Institute Summer 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510895369&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510895369
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10861653
        TIR
      jtl: Independent Review
      issn: 10861653
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Summer 2010
      vid: 15
      iid: 1
      pid: 2510
      pub: Independent Institute
    artinfo:
      ui: 510895369
      ppf: 53
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 12.1MB
      tig:
        atl: A Classical-Liberal Response to the Crisis of Bioethics.
      aug:
        au: Hall, Lauren K.
      su:
        Bioethics
        Liberalism
        Proof & certification of death
        Medical laws
      sug:
        subj:
          Bioethics
          Liberalism
          Proof & certification of death
          Medical laws
      ab: The writer discusses the the crises of purpose, principles, expectations, and authority that face modern bioethics and offers a response based on the debate in classical-liberal thought on how to limit power. The writer outlines the ways in which biomedical and governmental power resemble each other and identifies problems of control and legitimacy raised by appointing a final sovereign authority to resolve conflicts. The writer presents some alternatives to approaching the Hobbesian dilemma of controlling the controller.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N