Post-1979 Iran: Anti-colonialism and legacies of Euro-American spaces and temporalities.

The argument I put forth rests on an ostensibly simple and straightforward idea: the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran did not serve as an epistemic or epochal break in Iranian history. By viewing pre- and post-1979 Iran as mutually constitutive parts of a continuing history, and tracing the dynamic o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:HAGAR: Studies in Culture, Polity & Identities Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 91 - 115
Main Author: Ram, Haggai
Format: Article
Published: Ben Gurion University Summer 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510895810&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510895810
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15653323
        LKT
      jtl: HAGAR: Studies in Culture, Polity & Identities
      issn: 15653323
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Summer 2010
      vid: 9
      iid: 2
      pid: 15013
      pub: Ben Gurion University
    artinfo:
      ui: 510895810
      ppf: 91
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 10.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Post-1979 Iran: Anti-colonialism and legacies of Euro-American spaces and temporalities.
      aug:
        au: Ram, Haggai
      su:
        Iranian Revolution, 1979
        Decolonization
      sug:
        subj:
          Iranian Revolution, 1979
          Decolonization
      ab: The argument I put forth rests on an ostensibly simple and straightforward idea: the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran did not serve as an epistemic or epochal break in Iranian history. By viewing pre- and post-1979 Iran as mutually constitutive parts of a continuing history, and tracing the dynamic of the Islamic Republic of Iran's ongoing dialogue and engagement with Western representational practices, I show how Iran's current clerical leaders sought to reinterpret, appropriate, deflect and resist Eurocentric notions and constructions and, in doing so, also give them new meanings. The fact that Iran's representational strategies remain wedded to, and embedded in, Eurocentric discursive formations and subjectifications, I argue, is perhaps another testimony to the 1979 revolution's failure to live up to its decolonizing emancipatory vision. This predicament, no doubt, is common to many other postcolonial projects. However, the Iranian case is perhaps more intriguing, because the Islamic Republic of Iran is currently posited as the West's quintessential “other.” Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N