You Have to Speak Up to Remain Silent: The Supreme Court Revisits the Miranda Right to Silence.

The writer discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on the Berghuis v. Thompkins case, which was delivered on June 1, 2010, and relates it to the Miranda v. Arizona case. He aims to shed light on the issues of invocation and the waiver of the Miranda right to remain silent. He concludes that ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin Vol. 79; no. 9; pp. 25 - 32
Autor principal: Rudd, Jonathan L.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Superintendent of Documents September 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510913682&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510913682
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00145688
        FBI
      jtl: FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin
      issn: 00145688
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: September 2010
      vid: 79
      iid: 9
      pid: 372
      pub: Superintendent of Documents
    artinfo:
      ui: 510913682
      ppf: 25
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 4.3MB
      tig:
        atl: You Have to Speak Up to Remain Silent: The Supreme Court Revisits the Miranda Right to Silence.
      aug:
        au: Rudd, Jonathan L.
      su:
        Self-incrimination
        Police questioning
        Miranda v. Arizona
      sug:
        subj:
          Self-incrimination
          Police questioning
          Miranda v. Arizona
      keyword: United States -- Supreme Court -- Decisions
      ab: The writer discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on the Berghuis v. Thompkins case, which was delivered on June 1, 2010, and relates it to the Miranda v. Arizona case. He aims to shed light on the issues of invocation and the waiver of the Miranda right to remain silent. He concludes that based on the Berghuis case, it is evident that police officers are not required to obtain a waiver of a defendant's right to remain silent before commencing interrogation.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N