Widespread Policy Disruption and Interest Mobilization.
We consider the involvement of different interests in policymaking following disruptions that affect the agendas of multiple subsystems. The policy process literature suggests that increased policy uncertainty and jurisdictional ambiguity could lead to substantial upheavals in interest involvement....
| Publicado en: | Policy Studies Journal Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 793 - 816 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
November 2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510921512&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510921512 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0190292X PSJ jtl: Policy Studies Journal issn: 0190292X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: November 2009 vid: 37 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 510921512 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00335.x ppf: 793 ppct: 23 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 5.5MB tig: atl: Widespread Policy Disruption and Interest Mobilization. aug: au: May, Peter J. Sapotichne, Joshua Workman, Samuel su: United States politics & government September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001, & politics Decision making United States sug: subj: United States United States politics & government September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001, & politics Decision making ab: We consider the involvement of different interests in policymaking following disruptions that affect the agendas of multiple subsystems. The policy process literature suggests that increased policy uncertainty and jurisdictional ambiguity could lead to substantial upheavals in interest involvement. We address these possibilities in studying the mobilization of different interests after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, for eight disrupted policy subsystems. Contrary to expectations derived from the literature, we find limited evidence of interest upheaval or cross-subsystem spillovers in interest involvement. We suggest this is because policymakers sought to reduce policy uncertainty by calling upon those interests that were best equipped to help craft and implement policy solutions. These findings point to the stabilizing influence of policy subsystems in buffering against the effects of widespread disruptions. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|