Immigration, Crime, and Incarceration in Early Twentieth-Century America.

The major government commissions on immigration and crime in the early twentieth century relied on evidence that suffered from aggregation bias and the absence of accurate population data, which led them to present partial and sometimes misleading views of the immigrant-native criminality comparison...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Demography Vol. 46; no. 4; pp. 739 - 764
Autores principales: Moehling, Carolyn, Piehl, Anne Morrison
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Science & Business Media B.V. November 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510924278&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510924278
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00703370
        DEM
      jtl: Demography
      issn: 00703370
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: November 2009
      vid: 46
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510924278
        10.1353/dem.0.0076
      ppf: 739
      ppct: 25
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 6.5MB
      tig:
        atl: Immigration, Crime, and Incarceration in Early Twentieth-Century America.
      aug:
        au:
          Moehling, Carolyn
          Piehl, Anne Morrison
      su:
        United States history
        History of crime
        Crime
        Immigrants
        Imprisonment
        History
        History of immigrants
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          United States history
          History of crime
          Crime
          Immigrants
          Imprisonment
          History
          History of immigrants
      ab: The major government commissions on immigration and crime in the early twentieth century relied on evidence that suffered from aggregation bias and the absence of accurate population data, which led them to present partial and sometimes misleading views of the immigrant-native criminality comparison. With improved data and methods, we find that in 1904, prison commitment rates for more serious crimes were quite similar by nativity for all ages except ages 18 and 19, for which the commitment rate for immigrants was higher than for the native-born. By 1930, immigrants were less likely than natives to be committed to prisons at all ages 20 and older, but this advantage disappears when one looks at commitments for violent offenses. The time series pattern reflects a growing gap between natives and immigrants at older ages, one that was driven by sharp increases in the commitment rates of the native-born, while commitment rates for the foreign-born were remarkably stable. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N