The Market, the Firm, and the Economics Profession.

The mathematical and statistical complexity of economic research increased remarkably over the past century. While criticisms of the trend abound, the “wisdom of crowds” argument creates a presumption that the profession's acceptance of increasing mathematical sophistication is a net improvement. I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Economics & Sociology Vol. 68; no. 5; pp. 1041 - 1062
Autor principal: Sutter, Daniel
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell November 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510925124&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510925124
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00029246
        AES
      jtl: American Journal of Economics & Sociology
      issn: 00029246
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: November 2009
      vid: 68
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510925124
        10.1111/j.1536-7150.2009.00652.x
      ppf: 1041
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 9.1MB
      tig:
        atl: The Market, the Firm, and the Economics Profession.
      aug:
        au: Sutter, Daniel
      su:
        Economists
        Vocational guidance
        Economic research
        Mathematical economics
      sug:
        subj:
          Economists
          Vocational guidance
          Economic research
          Mathematical economics
      keyword: Economics as a profession
      ab: The mathematical and statistical complexity of economic research increased remarkably over the past century. While criticisms of the trend abound, the “wisdom of crowds” argument creates a presumption that the profession's acceptance of increasing mathematical sophistication is a net improvement. I provide a contrasting “market failure” argument for the excessive mathematization of economics. Academic research is not a cash-based economy, and this limits economists' ability to contract for assistance with technical research. Consequently, production of mathematical and statistical research must use the firm—the department—instead of the market. This alters the composition of the faculty and ultimately the economics curriculum, and the resulting level of sophistication may be greater than optimal. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N