Research Quality Rankings of Heterodox Economic Journals in a Contested Discipline.
This article argues that the discipline of economics consists of two subdisciplines: heterodox and mainstream economics. Being distinct bodies of knowledge, it is possible that the processes of building scientific knowledge are different enough so to generate distinctly different referencing and cit...
| Publicado en: | American Journal of Economics & Sociology Vol. 69; no. 5; pp. 1409 - 1453 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
November 2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510945747&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510945747 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00029246 AES jtl: American Journal of Economics & Sociology issn: 00029246 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: November 2010 vid: 69 iid: 5 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 510945747 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2010.00751.x ppf: 1409 ppct: 44 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 13MB tig: atl: Research Quality Rankings of Heterodox Economic Journals in a Contested Discipline. aug: au: Lee, Frederic S. Cronin, Bruce C. su: Economic periodicals Citation analysis Bibliometrics Social network analysis Research evaluation sug: subj: Economic periodicals Citation analysis Bibliometrics Social network analysis Research evaluation ab: This article argues that the discipline of economics consists of two subdisciplines: heterodox and mainstream economics. Being distinct bodies of knowledge, it is possible that the processes of building scientific knowledge are different enough so to generate distinctly different referencing and citation practices. Therefore, a specific impact contribution score is necessary for ranking heterodox journals in terms of their contribution to building heterodox economics. If properly developed such a metric could also be used to produce a single overall quality-equality ranking of mainstream and heterodox journals. Utilizing citation data and peer evaluations of 62 heterodox economics journals, a research quality measure is developed and then used to rank the journals. The measure is then used in conjunction with the SSCI five-year impact factor to produce a comparative research quality-equality rankings of the 62 heterodox and the 192 mainstream journals in the SSCI. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|