Deepening anarchism: international relations and the anarchist ideal.

Anarchist practice is localist and anarchist theory has generally followed in its disregard for the structures of global politics and the ways in which these undermine the possibility of the anarchist ideals. In this paper I set out one set of reasons as to why this state of affairs has come about a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Anarchist Studies Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 29 - 58
Autor principal: Prichard, Alex
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Lawrence & Wishart Ltd. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510965161&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510965161
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09673393
        H4R
      jtl: Anarchist Studies
      issn: 09673393
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2010
      vid: 18
      iid: 2
      pid: 16155
      pub: Lawrence & Wishart Ltd.
    artinfo:
      ui: 510965161
      ppf: 29
      ppct: 29
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Deepening anarchism: international relations and the anarchist ideal.
      aug:
        au: Prichard, Alex
      su:
        Anarchism
        Historiography
        Anarchists
      sug:
        subj:
          Anarchism
          Historiography
          Anarchists
      ab: Anarchist practice is localist and anarchist theory has generally followed in its disregard for the structures of global politics and the ways in which these undermine the possibility of the anarchist ideals. In this paper I set out one set of reasons as to why this state of affairs has come about and go back to the origins of anarchist thought to see if we can make sense of this contemporary context. I argue that a better understanding, a founding schism between Proudhon's revolutionary conservatism and Bakunin's revolutionary pan- Slavism can help us think through how we might consider 'the international' with greater sophistication vis-à-vis anarchist praxis. What I will argue is that Bakunin's position has stood the test of time within the anarchist movement, but that this is an unfortunate and counterproductive state of affairs. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT].
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N