Rothbard on Fractional Reserve Banking: A Critique.

The argument from Murray Rothbard in The Case for a 100 Percent Gold Dollar, published in 1974, that fractional reserve banking amounts to fraud rules out fractional reserve free banking even in a free market. This goes against fundamental ideas of liberty and the free market, both of which Rothbar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Independent Review Vol. 14; no. 4; pp. 497 - 513
Main Author: Rozeff, Michael S.
Format: Article
Published: Independent Institute Spring 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511017215&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 511017215
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10861653
        TIR
      jtl: Independent Review
      issn: 10861653
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring 2010
      vid: 14
      iid: 4
      pid: 2510
      pub: Independent Institute
    artinfo:
      ui: 511017215
      ppf: 497
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 12MB
      tig:
        atl: Rothbard on Fractional Reserve Banking: A Critique.
      aug:
        au: Rozeff, Michael S.
      su:
        Rothbard, Murray Newton, 1926-1995
        Bank reserves
        Bank deposits
      sug:
        subj:
          Bank reserves
          Bank deposits
          Rothbard, Murray Newton, 1926-1995
      ab: The argument from Murray Rothbard in The Case for a 100 Percent Gold Dollar, published in 1974, that fractional reserve banking amounts to fraud rules out fractional reserve free banking even in a free market. This goes against fundamental ideas of liberty and the free market, both of which Rothbard advocates. In proposing the illegality of fractional reserve banking, he introduces an ethical judgment based on his assessment of the merits of exchange transactions between banker and depositor. The writer provides a critique of the work of Murray Rothbard.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N