Ordering of information in conditional reasoning.

Two experiments are reported in which participants are asked to evaluate computer-presented conditional syllogisms consisting of a major premise (conditional rule), a minor premise and a conclusion. As an example the modus tollens inference with an affirmative conditional has the form if p then q, n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal of Psychology Vol. 89; no. 3; pp. 383 - 404
Autores principales: Evans, Jonathan St. B. T., Handley, Simon J., Buck, Edward
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell August 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511073080&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 511073080
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00071269
        BJP
      jtl: British Journal of Psychology
      issn: 00071269
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: August 1998
      vid: 89
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui: 511073080
      ppf: 383
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Ordering of information in conditional reasoning.
      aug:
        au:
          Evans, Jonathan St. B. T.
          Handley, Simon J.
          Buck, Edward
      su:
        Conditionals (Logic)
        Reasoning
      sug:
        subj:
          Conditionals (Logic)
          Reasoning
      ab: Two experiments are reported in which participants are asked to evaluate computer-presented conditional syllogisms consisting of a major premise (conditional rule), a minor premise and a conclusion. As an example the modus tollens inference with an affirmative conditional has the form if p then q, not-q therefore not-p. In these experiments, participants were asked to judge the validity of four types of conditional syllogisms with four types of conditional rule in which the presence and absence of negated components was varied. In Expt 1, half of the participants received problems with the conclusion presented prior to the premises, and half in the usual order. Experiment 2 combined this variable with a second: standard or reversed order of major and minor premises. Both manipulations substantially reduced the effects of the negative conclusion bias which is typically observed in this paradigm. The findings are discussed with respect to the debate between mental models and mental logic accounts of conditional inference. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N