Incomplete reporting of men's fertility in the United States and Britain: a research note.
The writers assess men's retrospective fertility histories from the British Household Panel Survey and the U.S. Panel Survey of Income Dynamics (PSID). In addition, they examine the PSID men's panel-updated fertility histories for their possible superiority over retrospective collection. They repo...
| Publicado en: | Demography Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 135 - 145 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
February 1999
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511099676&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 511099676 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00703370 DEM jtl: Demography issn: 00703370 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: February 1999 vid: 36 iid: 1 pid: 237 pub: Springer Science & Business Media B.V. artinfo: ui: 511099676 10.2307/2648139 ppf: 135 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: T tig: atl: Incomplete reporting of men's fertility in the United States and Britain: a research note. aug: au: Rendall, Michael S. Clarke, Lynda Peters, H. Elizabeth su: Fertility, Human Social surveys Response rates Statistical sampling Sociology methodology Statistical methods in sociology United States United Kingdom sug: subj: United States United Kingdom Fertility, Human Social surveys Response rates Statistical sampling Sociology methodology Statistical methods in sociology ab: The writers assess men's retrospective fertility histories from the British Household Panel Survey and the U.S. Panel Survey of Income Dynamics (PSID). In addition, they examine the PSID men's panel-updated fertility histories for their possible superiority over retrospective collection. They report that one-third to one-half of men's nonmarital births and births within previous marriages are missed in estimates from retrospective histories. They argue that differential survey underrepresentation of previously married men compared with previously married women explains a substantial proportion of the deficits in previous-marriage fertility. They assert that more recent retrospective histories and panel-updated fertility histories enhance reporting completeness, mainly by lowering the proportion of marital births from unions that are no longer intact at the survey date. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|