How much do we count? Interpretation and error-making in the decennial census.

In light of the critique of the 1990 U.S. decennial census procedures, a field study was conducted among low-income, inner-city residents in 1991 to analyze how they conceptualized and managed the civic task of census response. It was found that interpretations regarding the purpose and meaning of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Demography Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 121 - 135
Autores principales: Iversen, Roberta Rehner, Furstenberg, Frank F., Belzer, Alisa A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Science & Business Media B.V. February 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:In light of the critique of the 1990 U.S. decennial census procedures, a field study was conducted among low-income, inner-city residents in 1991 to analyze how they conceptualized and managed the civic task of census response. It was found that interpretations regarding the purpose and meaning of the census, about commitment to the task, and about connection to government, singly and together with literacy skills, were related to errors that cannot be detected by evaluative methodologies that are employed regularly by the Census Bureau. It is suggested that the validity and reliability of census data, and possibly other self-administered survey research, will be improved by greater use of knowledge about both interpretation and literacy skills in formulating data collection procedures.