Ontology with human subjects testing: an empirical investigation of geographic categories.

The paper presents a framework for the formulation and testing of ontological theories embodied in human cognition, concentrating primarily on the domain of geographic categories. Evidence for and against alternative theories of cognitive categories, for example on the part of E. Rosch and her asso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Economics & Sociology Vol. 58; no. 2; pp. 245 - 273
Autores principales: Smith, Barry, Mark, David
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell April 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511107363&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 511107363
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00029246
        AES
      jtl: American Journal of Economics & Sociology
      issn: 00029246
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: April 1999
      vid: 58
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        511107363
        10.1111/j.1536-7150.1998.tb03471.x
      ppf: 245
      ppct: 28
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Ontology with human subjects testing: an empirical investigation of geographic categories.
      aug:
        au:
          Smith, Barry
          Mark, David
      su:
        Ontology
        Cognition
        Geographical perception
        Categorization (Psychology)
      sug:
        subj:
          Ontology
          Cognition
          Geographical perception
          Categorization (Psychology)
      ab: The paper presents a framework for the formulation and testing of ontological theories embodied in human cognition, concentrating primarily on the domain of geographic categories. Evidence for and against alternative theories of cognitive categories, for example on the part of E. Rosch and her associates, has been hitherto based primarily on studies of categorization of entities of table-top space (pets, tools, fruits). We hypothesize that the structure of our categories does not remain constant as we move from categories of objects at manipulable scales to geographic categories such as nation, mountain, river. More precisely: Geographic objects are not merely located in space, they are tied intrinsically to space in such a way that they inherit from space many of its structural (mereological, topological, geometrical) properties. Categorization in the geographic world is often size- or scale-dependent (consider: pond, lake, sea, ocean), and to a much greater extent than in the world of table-top space, the realization that a thing or type of thing exists at all in the geographic world may have individual or cultural variability. Geographic objects are in very many cases the products of delineation within a continuum, and the boundaries of such objects are themselves highly salient phenomena for purposes of categorization. A battery of experiments is described to test these hypotheses and to serve as a basis for more detailed ontological theorizing. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N