Who's behind China's high-technology “revolution”? How bomb makers remade Beijing's priorities, policies, and institutions.
The writer explores how the Chinese central government and its advisors have influenced national investments in high technology in accordance with its opinion of what is important to China's national security and economic competitiveness. He argues that leading military-technical elites provided th...
| Publicado en: | International Security Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 95 - 127 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
MIT Press
Summer 1999
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511122235&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 511122235 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01622889 ISC jtl: International Security issn: 01622889 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Summer 1999 vid: 24 iid: 1 pid: 776 pub: MIT Press artinfo: ui: 511122235 10.1162/016228899560068 ppf: 95 ppct: 32 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: T tig: atl: Who's behind China's high-technology “revolution”? How bomb makers remade Beijing's priorities, policies, and institutions. aug: au: Feigenbaum, Evan A. su: High technology industries Industrial research Science & state Technology & state China sug: subj: China High technology industries Industrial research Science & state Technology & state ab: The writer explores how the Chinese central government and its advisors have influenced national investments in high technology in accordance with its opinion of what is important to China's national security and economic competitiveness. He argues that leading military-technical elites provided the initial push that facilitated China's shift from narrowly weapons-focused innovation and investment strategies to more comprehensive strategic technology efforts. He examines the substance of the policy agenda that emerged from this large-scale shift in strategy, focusing on China's top-priority critical technologies effort, known as the “863 program.” He concludes that although such programs have potential, they reflect persistent problems that plague government efforts to close the relative gap that separates China's high-tech industries from international standards. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|