Household behavior under alternative pay-as-you-throw systems for solid waste disposal.

A study was conducted to examine household behavior under alternative pay-as-you-throw systems for solid-waste disposal. Data were drawn from from a 1994 survey of residents of Marietta, Georgia, across 16 sanitation routes. Rather than pay a fixed monthly fee for collection, half of the residents...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Land Economics Vol. 75; no. 4; pp. 515 - 538
Autores principales: Van Houtven, George L., Morris, Glenn E.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Wisconsin Press November 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:A study was conducted to examine household behavior under alternative pay-as-you-throw systems for solid-waste disposal. Data were drawn from from a 1994 survey of residents of Marietta, Georgia, across 16 sanitation routes. Rather than pay a fixed monthly fee for collection, half of the residents paid a fee per reusable trash can, and half paid for each nonreusable trash bag collected. Findings revealed that the programs significantly reduced waste set-outs, even after accounting for increases in recycling. In addition, the bag program caused bigger reductions than the trash-can program, with reduction figures of 36 percent and 14 percent respectively. Rough estimates of the program suggest both savings for residents and social welfare increases.