Economics as progress: the LSE approach to econometric modelling and critical realism as programmes for research.
In the face of claims that economics is increasingly driven merely by fashion, this paper draws out certain similarities and differences between two self-consciously progressive and developmental research programmes—namely the LSE approach to econometric modelling and critical realism in economics....
| Publicado en: | Cambridge Journal of Economics Vol. 29; no. 2; pp. 179 - 206 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / UK
March 2005
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511244553&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 511244553 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0309166X CEC jtl: Cambridge Journal of Economics issn: 0309166X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: March 2005 vid: 29 iid: 2 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / UK artinfo: ui: 511244553 10.1093/cje/bei030 ppf: 179 ppct: 27 formats: tig: atl: Economics as progress: the LSE approach to econometric modelling and critical realism as programmes for research. aug: au: Pratten, Stephen su: Critical realism Econometrics sug: subj: Critical realism Econometrics ab: In the face of claims that economics is increasingly driven merely by fashion, this paper draws out certain similarities and differences between two self-consciously progressive and developmental research programmes—namely the LSE approach to econometric modelling and critical realism in economics. The argument is that, while these two programmes of research share a common point of departure and possess many common elements, what at root distinguishes them is their adoption of opposing philosophical orientations. The comparison enables both the nature of each programme, and the relevance of their common concerns, to be more easily appreciated and helps clarify the sort of evidence that would provide a basis for selecting one project over the other. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|