Bidding for surplus in network allocation problems.

In this paper we study non-cooperative foundations of network allocation rules. We focus on three allocation rules: the Myerson value, the position value and the component-wise egalitarian solution. For any of these three rules we provide a characterization based on component efficiency and some bal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Economic Theory Vol. 137; no. 1; pp. 493 - 512
Autor principal: Slikker, Marco
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Academic Press Inc. November 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511365338&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 511365338
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00220531
        RTH
      jtl: Journal of Economic Theory
      issn: 00220531
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: November 2007
      vid: 137
      iid: 1
      pid: 735
      pub: Academic Press Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        511365338
        10.1016/j.jet.2007.01.010
      ppf: 493
      ppct: 19
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Bidding for surplus in network allocation problems.
      aug:
        au: Slikker, Marco
      su:
        Resource allocation -- Mathematical models
        Social network analysis
      sug:
        subj:
          Resource allocation -- Mathematical models
          Social network analysis
      ab: In this paper we study non-cooperative foundations of network allocation rules. We focus on three allocation rules: the Myerson value, the position value and the component-wise egalitarian solution. For any of these three rules we provide a characterization based on component efficiency and some balanced contribution property. Additionally, we present three mechanisms whose equilibrium payoffs are well defined and coincide with the three rules under consideration if the underlying value function is monotonic. Non-monotonic value functions are shown to deal with allocation rules applied to monotonic covers. The mechanisms are inspired by the implementation of the Shapley value by Perez-Castrillo and Wettstein [Bidding for the surplus: a non-cooperative approach to the Shapley value, J. Econ. Theory 100 (2) (2001) 274-294]. Copyright (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N