From Mead to a Structural Symbolic Interactionism and Beyond.

This review discusses the continuing value of and problems in G.H. Mead's contributions to sociology from the standpoint of the contemporary discipline. It argues that the value is considerable and the problems largely avoidable with modifications to Mead's framework; it also offers necessary modifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Annual Review of Sociology Vol. 34; pp. 15 - 32
Autor principal: Stryker, Sheldon
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Annual Reviews Inc. 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511382762&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 511382762
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03600572
        ASO
      jtl: Annual Review of Sociology
      issn: 03600572
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2008
      vid: 34
      pid: 59
      pub: Annual Reviews Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        511382762
        10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134649
      ppf: 15
      ppct: 17
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: From Mead to a Structural Symbolic Interactionism and Beyond.
      aug:
        au: Stryker, Sheldon
      su:
        Mead, George Herbert, 1863-1931
        Symbolic interactionism
        Sociological research
      sug:
        subj:
          Symbolic interactionism
          Sociological research
          Mead, George Herbert, 1863-1931
      ab: This review discusses the continuing value of and problems in G.H. Mead's contributions to sociology from the standpoint of the contemporary discipline. It argues that the value is considerable and the problems largely avoidable with modifications to Mead's framework; it also offers necessary modifications via structural symbolic interactionism. Permitting the development of testable theories such as identity theory is a major criterion in evaluating a frame, and capacity to bridge to other frames and theories inside and outside sociology is another. The review examines bridges from the structural symbolic interactionist frame and identity theory to other symbolic interactionist theories, to other social psychological frames and theories in sociology, to cognitive social psychology, and to structural sociology. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N