Looking Ahead Optimally in Allocating Aid.
The Collier-Dollar approach to aid allocation among countries has been less than fully embraced by donors–even those focused on poverty reduction–partly because it conflicts with the approach to aid allocation implied by the Millennium Development Goals. These two approaches are shown to be special...
| Publicado en: | World Development Vol. 36; no. 7; pp. 1135 - 1152 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier Science
July 2008
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511393326&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 511393326 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0305750X WDV jtl: World Development issn: 0305750X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: July 2008 vid: 36 iid: 7 pid: 2410 pub: Elsevier Science artinfo: ui: 511393326 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.08.002 ppf: 1135 ppct: 17 formats: tig: atl: Looking Ahead Optimally in Allocating Aid. aug: au: Wood, Adrian su: International economic assistance Mathematical models Resource allocation -- Mathematical models Poor people Developing countries sug: subj: International economic assistance Mathematical models Resource allocation -- Mathematical models Poor people Developing countries ab: The Collier-Dollar approach to aid allocation among countries has been less than fully embraced by donors–even those focused on poverty reduction–partly because it conflicts with the approach to aid allocation implied by the Millennium Development Goals. These two approaches are shown to be special cases of a more general model of aid allocation, in which donors care about future as well as current poverty. This model is illustratively applied to data for developing regions. Adding a poverty decline adjustment to the allocation formulae used by donors could resolve the conflict between the two approaches. Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|