On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies.

Within the context of the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, we developed a general theoretical framework for deciding when it is more efficient to process two tasks in serial and when it is more efficient to process them in parallel. This analysis suggests that a serial mode is more ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Cognitive Psychology Vol. 58; no. 3; pp. 273 - 311
Autores principales: Miller, Jeff, Ulrich, Rolf, Rolke, Bettina
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Academic Press Inc. May 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511416219&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 511416219
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00100285
        COP
      jtl: Cognitive Psychology
      issn: 00100285
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May 2009
      vid: 58
      iid: 3
      pid: 735
      pub: Academic Press Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        511416219
        10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003
      ppf: 273
      ppct: 38
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies.
      aug:
        au:
          Miller, Jeff
          Ulrich, Rolf
          Rolke, Bettina
      su:
        Human information processing
        Reaction time
        Cognitive interference
      sug:
        subj:
          Human information processing
          Reaction time
          Cognitive interference
      ab: Within the context of the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, we developed a general theoretical framework for deciding when it is more efficient to process two tasks in serial and when it is more efficient to process them in parallel. This analysis suggests that a serial mode is more efficient than a parallel mode under a wide variety of conditions and thereby suggests that ubiquitous evidence of serial processing in PRP tasks could result from performance optimization rather than from a structural bottleneck. The analysis further suggests that the experimenter-selected distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) influences the relative efficiency of the serial and parallel modes, with a preponderance of short SOAs favoring a parallel mode. Experiments varying the distribution of SOAs were conducted, and the results suggest that there is a shift from a more serial mode to a more parallel mode as the likelihood of short SOAs increases. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N