Is the Allocation of Resources within the Household Efficient? New Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.

I study whether households make Pareto-efficient intrahousehold resource allocation decisions. Combining randomized variation in women's income generated by the evaluation of the Mexican PROGRESA program with variation attributable to localized rainfall shocks as distribution factors in the collecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Political Economy Vol. 117; no. 3; pp. 453 - 504
Autor principal: Bobonis, Gustavo J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Chicago Press June 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511420897&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 511420897
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00223808
        JPE
      jtl: Journal of Political Economy
      issn: 00223808
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: June 2009
      vid: 117
      iid: 3
      pid: 415
      pub: University of Chicago Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        511420897
        10.1086/600076
      ppf: 453
      ppct: 51
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Is the Allocation of Resources within the Household Efficient? New Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.
      aug:
        au: Bobonis, Gustavo J.
      su:
        Programa de Educación, Salud y Alimentación (Mexico City, Mexico)
        Resource allocation -- Mathematical models
        Households & economics
      sug:
        subj:
          Programa de Educación, Salud y Alimentación (Mexico City, Mexico)
          Resource allocation -- Mathematical models
          Households & economics
      ab: I study whether households make Pareto-efficient intrahousehold resource allocation decisions. Combining randomized variation in women's income generated by the evaluation of the Mexican PROGRESA program with variation attributable to localized rainfall shocks as distribution factors in the collective model, I find evidence favoring Pareto optimality. More specifically, female-specific income changes have positive effects on children's goods expenditures, whereas changes due to rainfall shocks have a smaller influence on household public goods expenditures. The evidence is consistent with female partners having greater sensitivity to own-income changes and norms that oblige women to devote their earnings to meet collective consumption needs. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N