Whither Cognitive Bias Modification Research? Commentary on the Special Section Articles.
This commentary reviews key theoretical, methodological, and clinical issues raised by recent research on cognitive bias modification (CBM). The authors identify the major ways in which the new work reported within this special section extends earlier CBM research. In particular, they note that it c...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Abnormal Psychology Vol. 118; no. 1; pp. 89 - 100 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
February 2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511445372&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 511445372 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0021843X JAP jtl: Journal of Abnormal Psychology issn: 0021843X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: February 2009 vid: 118 iid: 1 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 511445372 10.1037/a0014878 ppf: 89 ppct: 11 formats: tig: atl: Whither Cognitive Bias Modification Research? Commentary on the Special Section Articles. aug: au: MacLeod, Colin Koster, Ernst H. W. Fox, Elaine su: Mental depression Therapeutics Anxiety disorders Thought & thinking sug: subj: Mental depression Therapeutics Anxiety disorders Thought & thinking keyword: Anxiety neurosis ab: This commentary reviews key theoretical, methodological, and clinical issues raised by recent research on cognitive bias modification (CBM). The authors identify the major ways in which the new work reported within this special section extends earlier CBM research. In particular, they note that it considers a wider range of participants, includes a greater diversity of symptoms measures, and targets for change a broader array of processing biases than previously has been the case. Furthermore, they point out that the present work develops and employs a more diverse arsenal of bias modification procedures, in some cases delivered across extended periods of time within naturalistic settings. They also draw attention to methodological limitations associated with the current studies, offering recommendations concerning how future CBM research might profitably build upon these exciting new directions while overcoming such limitations. Finally, they evaluate the theoretical and applied implications of the reported findings, discussing their capacity to illuminate the causal contributions made by cognitive bias to emotional vulnerability and their promise concerning the potential therapeutic value of CBM as a clinical tool. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|