Economic Geography within and between European Nations: The Role of Market Potential and Density across Space and Time.

In explaining the uneven spatial distribution of economic activity, urban economics, and new economic geography (NEG) dominate recent research in economics. A main difference between these two approaches is that NEG stresses the role of spatial linkages whereas urban economics does not do so. We est...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Regional Science Vol. 49; no. 4; pp. 777 - 801
Autores principales: Brakman, Steven, Garretsen, Harry, Marrewijk, Charles van
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell October 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511446596&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 511446596
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00224146
        RSC
      jtl: Journal of Regional Science
      issn: 00224146
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: October 2009
      vid: 49
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        511446596
        10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00633.x
      ppf: 777
      ppct: 24
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Economic Geography within and between European Nations: The Role of Market Potential and Density across Space and Time.
      aug:
        au:
          Brakman, Steven
          Garretsen, Harry
          Marrewijk, Charles van
      su:
        Urban economics
        Economic geography
        Spacetime
        Economic development
        European Union countries
      sug:
        subj:
          European Union countries
          Urban economics
          Economic geography
          Spacetime
          Economic development
      ab: In explaining the uneven spatial distribution of economic activity, urban economics, and new economic geography (NEG) dominate recent research in economics. A main difference between these two approaches is that NEG stresses the role of spatial linkages whereas urban economics does not do so. We estimate simple versions of these two views on economic geography and also establish if the relevance of spatial linkages varies across aggregation levels or time. For our sample of 14 European countries and 213 corresponding regions, we find that spatial linkages are more important at the country level and that its relevance varies across time. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N