Ranking Scholarly Publishers in Political Science: An Alternative Approach.

The writers generated a ranking of scholarly publishers in political science using data from a survey of 603 American political scientists. Open-ended questions were used respondents to determine those scholarly publishers (1) to which they would submit “a very strong book manuscript” in their area...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:PS: Political Science & Politics Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 375 - 384
Autores principales: Garand, James C., Giles, Micheal W.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press April 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511476016&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 511476016
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10490965
        PSP
      jtl: PS: Political Science & Politics
      issn: 10490965
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: April 2011
      vid: 44
      iid: 2
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        511476016
        10.1017/S1049096511000229
      ppf: 375
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Ranking Scholarly Publishers in Political Science: An Alternative Approach.
      aug:
        au:
          Garand, James C.
          Giles, Micheal W.
      su:
        Political scientists
        Scholarly publishing
        Rating of scholarly periodicals
        Attitude (Psychology)
      sug:
        subj:
          Political scientists
          Scholarly publishing
          Rating of scholarly periodicals
          Attitude (Psychology)
      ab: The writers generated a ranking of scholarly publishers in political science using data from a survey of 603 American political scientists. Open-ended questions were used respondents to determine those scholarly publishers (1) to which they would submit “a very strong book manuscript” in their area of expertise, and (2) that they “read regularly or otherwise rely for the best research” in their area of expertise. The writers created rankings of scholarly presses based on publication and reading preferences. The writers found that certain high-profile university presses constitute a clear first tier in American political scientists' preference orderings, followed by a mix of commercial and university presses that embody the second tier and beyond.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N