Tests of Intrahousehold Resource Allocation Using a CV Framework: A Comparison of Husbands' and Wives' Separate and Joint WTP in the Slums of Navi-Mumbai, India.
Husbands and wives from 422 households in the slums of Navi-Mumbai. India, were interviewed separately first and jointly thereafter in a contingent valuation framework to assess their individual and joint household willingness to pay (WTP) for malaria vaccines. Husbands' and wives' demand differed s...
| Publicado en: | World Development Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 606 - 620 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier Science
April 2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511490186&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 511490186 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0305750X WDV jtl: World Development issn: 0305750X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: April 2010 vid: 38 iid: 4 pid: 2410 pub: Elsevier Science artinfo: ui: 511490186 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.12.002 ppf: 606 ppct: 14 formats: tig: atl: Tests of Intrahousehold Resource Allocation Using a CV Framework: A Comparison of Husbands' and Wives' Separate and Joint WTP in the Slums of Navi-Mumbai, India. aug: au: Prabhu, Vimalanand S. su: Contingent valuation Malaria vaccines Married people's attitudes Resource allocation -- Mathematical models Social history Bombay (India) sug: subj: Bombay (India) Contingent valuation Malaria vaccines Married people's attitudes Resource allocation -- Mathematical models Social history ab: Husbands and wives from 422 households in the slums of Navi-Mumbai. India, were interviewed separately first and jointly thereafter in a contingent valuation framework to assess their individual and joint household willingness to pay (WTP) for malaria vaccines. Husbands' and wives' demand differed significantly when they were interviewed separately but not when they were interviewed jointly. The author rejects the common preference model and unified (bargaining) model of intrahousehold resource allocation. Researchers should consider the complexity of intrahousehold decision making when they conduct stated preference surveys, even in patriarchal societies. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|