Costs (Historical versus Current) versus Exit Values.

The three alternative methods of accounting are sharply distinguished, the questions regarding those methods are segregated, a criterion -- relevance -- that will discriminate the methods is identified, and that criterion is applied to the alternatives. The relevance criterion is applied initially i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Abacus Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 93 - 130
Autor principal: Sterling, Robert R.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec81
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=5119767&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 5119767
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00013072
        AUB
      jtl: Abacus
      issn: 00013072
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec81
      vid: 17
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        5119767
        10.1111/j.1467-6281.1981.tb00104.x
      ppf: 93
      ppct: 37
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.5MB
      tig:
        atl: Costs (Historical versus Current) versus Exit Values.
      aug:
        au: Sterling, Robert R.
        affil: Winspear Distinguished Professor, University of Alberta
      su:
        Historical costs (Accounting)
        Cost accounting
        Current value accounting
        Assets (Accounting)
        Total cost of ownership
        Accounting standards
      sug:
        subj:
          Historical costs (Accounting)
          Cost accounting
          Current value accounting
          Assets (Accounting)
          Total cost of ownership
          Accounting standards
      keyword:
        Accounting theory
        Assets
        Financial reporting
      ab: The three alternative methods of accounting are sharply distinguished, the questions regarding those methods are segregated, a criterion -- relevance -- that will discriminate the methods is identified, and that criterion is applied to the alternatives. The relevance criterion is applied initially in the context of a simple case and subsequently in the context of more complex cases. The exit value system is supported because the exit value of an owned asset is demonstrably relevant to exchange decisions and because it fares no worse than other systems when other criteria such as additivity, are considered.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Abacus is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Abacus
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1981
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N