The politics of space, time and substance: state formation, nationalism, and ethnicity.

A crucial issue in the study of nationalism, ethnicity, and state formation is defining the relationship between commonsense categories of experience and analytical concepts that have been developed in order to understand the processes that create such categories and result in their being taken for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annual Review of Anthropology Vol. 23; pp. 379 - 406
Main Author: Alonso, Ana María
Format: Article
Published: Annual Reviews Inc. 1994
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=512368134&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 512368134
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00846570
        AOA
      jtl: Annual Review of Anthropology
      issn: 00846570
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 1994
      vid: 23
      pid: 59
      pub: Annual Reviews Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        512368134
        10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.002115
      ppf: 379
      ppct: 27
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The politics of space, time and substance: state formation, nationalism, and ethnicity.
      aug:
        au: Alonso, Ana María
      su:
        State, The
        Nationalism
        Political geography
        Spacetime
        Ethnicity
      sug:
        subj:
          State, The
          Nationalism
          Political geography
          Spacetime
          Ethnicity
      ab: A crucial issue in the study of nationalism, ethnicity, and state formation is defining the relationship between commonsense categories of experience and analytical concepts that have been developed in order to understand the processes that create such categories and result in their being taken for granted. Although the inclusion of the state as an analytical category and ethnographic focus in mainstream sociocultural anthropology is to be welcomed, a critical perspective additionally involves going beyond the nation-state and developing a global vision while continuing to concentrate on the micropractices of daily life. If the postmodern condition contains both liberatory and reactionary possibilities, more consideration of the political role of anthropologists in today's world is required.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N