Does package size matter? a unit-price analysis of “demand” for food in baboons.

In a study examining “demand” for food, responding of 8 adult male baboons (Papio c. anubis) was maintained under a fixed-ratio schedule of food reinforcement during daily 23-hr experimental sessions. Completion of the ratio requirement resulted in the delivery of one, five, or 10 1-g food pellets....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Vol. 62; pp. 293 - 307
Autor principal: Foltin, Richard W.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior September 1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=512513428&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 512513428
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00225002
        JOE
      jtl: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
      issn: 00225002
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: September 1994
      vid: 62
      pid: 508
      pub: Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
    artinfo:
      ui:
        512513428
        10.1901/jeab.1994.62-293
      ppf: 293
      ppct: 14
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Does package size matter? a unit-price analysis of “demand” for food in baboons.
      aug:
        au: Foltin, Richard W.
      su:
        Animal feeding behavior
        Baboon behavior
        Reinforcement (Psychology)
        Psychology
        Economics
      sug:
        subj:
          Animal feeding behavior
          Baboon behavior
          Reinforcement (Psychology)
          Psychology
          Economics
      ab: In a study examining “demand” for food, responding of 8 adult male baboons (Papio c. anubis) was maintained under a fixed-ratio schedule of food reinforcement during daily 23-hr experimental sessions. Completion of the ratio requirement resulted in the delivery of one, five, or 10 1-g food pellets. Supplemental feeding was limited to fruit and a dog biscuit daily. Responding increased as “cost” was increased across a wide range of fixed-ratio values before reaching a maximum and then decreasing. Increasing the number of food pellets per delivery decreased total responding and the number of reinforcements per day. A unit-price analysis, in which intake was converted to grams per day and fixed-ratio values were converted to responses per gram, yielded demand functions that overlapped at lower unit prices. Under one or more multiple-pellet conditions, however, intake decreased more quickly than under the one-pellet condition as the fixed-ratio value was increased in all but 1 baboon. This indicates that even when using unit-price conversions, there was variability in total intake. Although unit-price conversions yielded intake data that were more consistent across conditions, conditions differed in response topography even at the same unit prices: Under the multiple-pellet conditions there were longer pauses in responding, running response rate was slower, and the first eating bout (i.e., “meal”) of the session was smaller than under the one-pellet condition. These findings (a) support the heuristic value of a unit-price analysis for studying responding for and consumption of commodities that have similar attributes, and (b) indicate that different response topographies may result in similar intakes of a commodity. Copyright 1994 by the Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Inc.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N