Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading nonwords: hough dou peapel rede gnew wirds?

In Experiment 1, participants read a long list of nonwords and made ratings of pronunciation variability. Experiment 2 compared speeded naming of nonwords presented alone or mixed with words. In both experiments, at least 85% of nonwords based on inconsistent word bodies were pronounced according...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 1052 - 1087
Autores principales: Andrews, Sally, Scarratt, Danielle R.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Psychological Association August 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=512687100&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 512687100
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00961523
        EPH
      jtl: Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance
      issn: 00961523
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: August 1998
      vid: 24
      iid: 4
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        512687100
        10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1052
      ppf: 1052
      ppct: 35
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading nonwords: hough dou peapel rede gnew wirds?
      aug:
        au:
          Andrews, Sally
          Scarratt, Danielle R.
      su:
        Word recognition
        English language pronunciation
      sug:
        subj:
          Word recognition
          English language pronunciation
      ab: In Experiment 1, participants read a long list of nonwords and made ratings of pronunciation variability. Experiment 2 compared speeded naming of nonwords presented alone or mixed with words. In both experiments, at least 85% of nonwords based on inconsistent word bodies were pronounced according to spelling–sound rules, but regular pronunciations were assigned to only 30–40% of nonwords with no regular word-body neighbors. Contradicting the prediction of parallel-distributed-processing models of nonword naming, the probability of an irregular pronunciation was a function of the proportion of irregular word neighbors, not the frequency of these neighbors. The dual-route cascade model overestimated the proportion of regular nonword pronunciations but successfully predicted the particular nonwords most likely to be pronounced irregularly. These results highlight the issues that must be addressed in future refinements of models of nonword naming. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N