A quasi-experimental assessment of the effect of computerizing noncognitive paper-and pencil measurements: a test of measurement equivalence.

Previous studies have provided evidence to question the equivalence of data gathered by different administration modes and to suggest that noncognitive instruments validated for paper-and-pencil administration may not be valid for computerized administration. In this study, a series of analyses of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos

Publicado en:	Journal of Applied Psychology Vol. 80; pp. 643 - 652
Autores principales:	King, Wesley C., Miles, Edward W.
Formato:	Artículo
Publicado:	American Psychological Association December 1995
Materias:	Examination administrators Test validity Computer software Examinations
Acceso en línea:	Ver este registro en EBSCOhost