Winners and losers in a world with global warming: noncooperation, altruism, and social welfare.
The writers examine global warming as an asymmetric transboundary externality in a win-lose scenario, using a two-country model to investigate the effects of global warming on resource allocations, global and national welfare, and the global-warming stock. They determine that the winner country's g...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Environmental Economics & Management Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 256 - 272 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Academic Press Inc.
May 1999
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=512829856&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 512829856 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00950696 EEM jtl: Journal of Environmental Economics & Management issn: 00950696 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May 1999 vid: 37 iid: 3 pid: 735 pub: Academic Press Inc. artinfo: ui: 512829856 10.1006/jeem.1999.1068 ppf: 256 ppct: 16 formats: tig: atl: Winners and losers in a world with global warming: noncooperation, altruism, and social welfare. aug: au: Caplan, Arthur J. Ellis, Christopher J. Silva, Emilson C. D. su: Welfare economics Economic impact of global warming Externalities Mathematical models Altruism Resource allocation -- Mathematical models sug: subj: Welfare economics Economic impact of global warming Externalities Mathematical models Altruism Resource allocation -- Mathematical models ab: The writers examine global warming as an asymmetric transboundary externality in a win-lose scenario, using a two-country model to investigate the effects of global warming on resource allocations, global and national welfare, and the global-warming stock. They determine that the winner country's greenhouse gas emissions are positively related to the loser's but that the loser's are negatively related to the winner's. They conclude that although it is unlikely that an accord will be reached between the two sides, agreements that take the current greenhouse gas stock as a given are more likely to be successful than those that attempt to change this stock. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|