Clinical child and developmental-clinical programs: perhaps necessary but not sufficient?

Part of a special section on the importance of incorporating developmental theory into clinical child training. The writer presents a personal perspective on what clinical child psychology is and should be. He contends that both clinical child and developmental-clinical approaches to training may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Clinical Child Psychology Vol. 28; no. 4; pp. 476 - 482
Autor principal: Forehand, Rex
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd December 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=512910011&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 512910011
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0047228X
        JCG
      jtl: Journal of Clinical Child Psychology
      issn: 0047228X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: December 1999
      vid: 28
      iid: 4
      pid: 820
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui: 512910011
      ppf: 476
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Clinical child and developmental-clinical programs: perhaps necessary but not sufficient?
      aug:
        au: Forehand, Rex
      su:
        Developmental psychology
        Child psychology education
        Doctoral degree
        Clinical psychologists
        Training
      sug:
        subj:
          Developmental psychology
          Child psychology education
          Doctoral degree
          Clinical psychologists
          Training
      ab: Part of a special section on the importance of incorporating developmental theory into clinical child training. The writer presents a personal perspective on what clinical child psychology is and should be. He contends that both clinical child and developmental-clinical approaches to training may be too narrow or limiting when considering the science component of clinical psychology, and he suggests considering broader alternatives, such as an ecological training model. In addition, he proposes that the type of training program chosen is not the only factor to consider, as the working relationship between the individual faculty member and graduate student exerts significant influence on what a student learns in a graduate program.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N