The politics of reproductive benefits: U.S. insurance coverage of contraceptive and infertility treatments.

The writers argue that recent alterations in access to contraceptives and infertility treatments in the state of Illinois, and across the U.S., have heightened the class cleavages in access to reproductive health care benefits in the U.S., and they attempt to uncover how this unequal distribution ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Gender & Society Vol. 11; pp. 8 - 31
Autores principales: King, Leslie, Meyer, Madonna Harrington
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. February 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=512949934&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 512949934
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08912432
        GES
      jtl: Gender & Society
      issn: 08912432
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: February 1997
      vid: 11
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        512949934
        10.1177/089124397011001002
      ppf: 8
      ppct: 23
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The politics of reproductive benefits: U.S. insurance coverage of contraceptive and infertility treatments.
      aug:
        au:
          King, Leslie
          Meyer, Madonna Harrington
      su:
        Human reproductive technology laws
        Infertility -- Treatment
        Health insurance
        Medicaid
        Illinois
      sug:
        subj:
          Illinois
          Human reproductive technology laws
          Infertility -- Treatment
          Health insurance
          Medicaid
      ab: The writers argue that recent alterations in access to contraceptives and infertility treatments in the state of Illinois, and across the U.S., have heightened the class cleavages in access to reproductive health care benefits in the U.S., and they attempt to uncover how this unequal distribution came about. Using data from government testimonies, public documents, and telephone interviews, they found that poor women have broad access to contraceptive coverage but little access to infertility treatment, whereas working- and middle-class women have increasingly broad coverage of infertility treatments but scarce coverage of contraceptives. They conclude that although the extreme measures of the eugenics movement are less frequently demonstrated, class differences in access to reproductive services result in an equally dualistic, albeit unstated, fertility policy in the U.S.: encouraging births among working- and middle-class families and discouraging births among the poor, especially those on Medicaid.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N