You must see the point: automatic processing of cues to the direction of social attention.
Four experiments explored the processing of pointing gestures comprising hand and combined head and gaze cues to direction. The cross-modal interference effect exerted by pointing hand gestures on the processing of spoken directional words, first noted by S. R. H. Langton, C. O'Malley, and V. Bruce...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance Vol. 26; no. 2; pp. 747 - 758 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
April 2000
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=512956261&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 512956261 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00961523 EPH jtl: Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance issn: 00961523 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: April 2000 vid: 26 iid: 2 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 512956261 10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.747 ppf: 747 ppct: 11 formats: tig: atl: You must see the point: automatic processing of cues to the direction of social attention. aug: au: Langton, Stephen R. H. Bruce, Vicki su: Prompts (Psychology) Nonverbal communication Attention Cognitive interference sug: subj: Prompts (Psychology) Nonverbal communication Attention Cognitive interference ab: Four experiments explored the processing of pointing gestures comprising hand and combined head and gaze cues to direction. The cross-modal interference effect exerted by pointing hand gestures on the processing of spoken directional words, first noted by S. R. H. Langton, C. O'Malley, and V. Bruce (1996), was found to be moderated by the orientation of the gesturer's head–gaze (Experiment 1). Hand and head cues also produced bidirectional interference effects in a within-modalities version of the task (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that both head–gaze and hand cues to direction are processed automatically and in parallel up to a stage in processing where a directional decision is computed. In support of this model, head–gaze cues produced no influence on nondirectional decisions to social emblematic gestures in Experiment 3 but exerted significant interference effects on directional responses to arrows in Experiment 4. It is suggested that the automatic analysis of head, gaze, and pointing gestures occurs because these directional signals are processed as cues to the direction of another individual's social attention. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|