The paradox of principles: the dialectics of Hayek's liberalism.

The writer endeavors to resolve the conundrums in relation to Friedrich Hayek by conducting a reexamination of his work. He reveals that Hayek's work has attracted contradictory epithets, and the paradox is reinforced by Hayek's own forceful rejection of dogmatic rationalism and all forms of intell...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Economy & Society Vol. 29; no. 2; pp. 207 - 239
Autor principal: Nafissi, Mohammad R.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd May 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=512972219&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 512972219
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03085147
        5B0
      jtl: Economy & Society
      issn: 03085147
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May 2000
      vid: 29
      iid: 2
      pid: 337
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        512972219
        10.1080/030851400360479
      ppf: 207
      ppct: 32
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The paradox of principles: the dialectics of Hayek's liberalism.
      aug:
        au: Nafissi, Mohammad R.
      su:
        Hayek, Friedrich A. von (Friedrich August), 1899-1992
        Liberalism
        Capitalism
        Ideology
        Social theory
      sug:
        subj:
          Liberalism
          Capitalism
          Ideology
          Social theory
          Hayek, Friedrich A. von (Friedrich August), 1899-1992
      ab: The writer endeavors to resolve the conundrums in relation to Friedrich Hayek by conducting a reexamination of his work. He reveals that Hayek's work has attracted contradictory epithets, and the paradox is reinforced by Hayek's own forceful rejection of dogmatic rationalism and all forms of intellectual and political eclecticism. In an effort to relate and resolve these conundrums, he considers Hayek's work in the light of the question of how to reconcile the decline of liberal capitalism, considered to be the freest and most efficient order conceivable, with an evolutionary discourse that precluded such a possibility. He demonstrates that both eclecticism and ideological closure are intrinsic to Hayek's unique mission to advance the cause of “progress” against the constant threat posed by collectivism.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N