Software for qualitative research: 2. Some thoughts on 'aiding' analysis.

The writers dismiss accounts that depict computer aided qualitative data analysis software as neutral and harmless, and they argue instead that applying computer software to qualitative projects raises some significant concerns that go to the heart of ethnography. Although they initially work with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Environment & Planning A Vol. 29; pp. 1109 - 1125
Autores principales: Hinchliffe, Steve J., Crang, Mike, Reimer, Suzanne M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Pion Limited June 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=513004936&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 513004936
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0308518X
        EPL
      jtl: Environment & Planning A
      issn: 0308518X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: June 1997
      vid: 29
      pid: 1065
      pub: Pion Limited
    artinfo:
      ui:
        513004936
        10.1068/a291109
      ppf: 1109
      ppct: 16
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Software for qualitative research: 2. Some thoughts on 'aiding' analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Hinchliffe, Steve J.
          Crang, Mike
          Reimer, Suzanne M.
      su:
        Social science software
        Social science methodology
      sug:
        subj:
          Social science software
          Social science methodology
      ab: The writers dismiss accounts that depict computer aided qualitative data analysis software as neutral and harmless, and they argue instead that applying computer software to qualitative projects raises some significant concerns that go to the heart of ethnography. Although they initially work with a distinction between tactile and digital ethnographics, the issues that they discuss are not unique to computer-aided studies. They contend that the decision to use computers marks a useful moment in which to critically examine the means and ends of qualitative analysis. They advise qualitative researchers to avoid both a total rejection and an unquestioning adoption of computer software packages. They suggest a “crafty” approach to ethnography whereby computers are included in the body of research in a critically reflexive and creative way. They consider the potential of such incorporation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N