Motivating wealth-constrained actors.

We examine how owners of productive resources (e.g., public enterprises or financial capital) optimally allocate their resources among wealth-constrained operators of unknown ability. Optimal allocations exhibit: (1) shared enterprise profit—the resource owner always shares the operator's profit;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Economic Review Vol. 90; no. 4; pp. 944 - 961
Autores principales: Lewis, Tracy R., Sappington, David E. M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Economic Association September 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=513014615&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 513014615
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00028282
        AER
      jtl: American Economic Review
      issn: 00028282
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: September 2000
      vid: 90
      iid: 4
      pid: 22
      pub: American Economic Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        513014615
        10.1257/aer.90.4.944
      ppf: 944
      ppct: 17
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Motivating wealth-constrained actors.
      aug:
        au:
          Lewis, Tracy R.
          Sappington, David E. M.
      su:
        Resource allocation -- Mathematical models
        Wealth
        Mathematical models
      sug:
        subj:
          Resource allocation -- Mathematical models
          Wealth
          Mathematical models
      ab: We examine how owners of productive resources (e.g., public enterprises or financial capital) optimally allocate their resources among wealth-constrained operators of unknown ability. Optimal allocations exhibit: (1) shared enterprise profit—the resource owner always shares the operator's profit; (2) dispersed enterprise ownership—resources are widely distributed among operators of varying ability; (3) limited benefits of competition—the owner may not benefit from increased competition for the resource; and, sometimes, (4) diluted incentives for the most capable—more capable operators receive smaller shares of the returns they generate. Implications for privatizations and venture capital arrangements are explored. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N