Social class differences in mortality using the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification—too little, too soon: a reply to Chandola.
Chandola's (2000; Social Science and Medicine, 50(5), 641–649) claims that the UK National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC) is not significantly related to mortality are examined. It is shown that this result is likely to be an artefact of the data and methods he uses. Other findi...
| Published in: | Social Science & Medicine Vol. 51; no. 7; pp. 1121 - 1128 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Elsevier Science
October 2000
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=513021471&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 513021471 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02779536 SMD jtl: Social Science & Medicine issn: 02779536 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: October 2000 vid: 51 iid: 7 pid: 2410 pub: Elsevier Science artinfo: ui: 513021471 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00136-2 ppf: 1121 ppct: 7 formats: tig: atl: Social class differences in mortality using the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification—too little, too soon: a reply to Chandola. aug: au: Rose, D. Pevalin, D. J. su: Health & social status Mortality Social classes United Kingdom sug: subj: United Kingdom Health & social status Mortality Social classes ab: Chandola's (2000; Social Science and Medicine, 50(5), 641–649) claims that the UK National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC) is not significantly related to mortality are examined. It is shown that this result is likely to be an artefact of the data and methods he uses. Other findings and interpretations in his paper are also critically discussed. In the process, various theoretical, measurement and analysis issues relating to the use of classifications such as the NS-SEC in health research are reviewed. Copyright 2000, Pergamon Press Ltd. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|