Regularity effects in word naming: what are they?
In a word-naming experiment, word-body consistency was crossed with grapheme-to-phoneme regularity to test predictions of current models of word recognition. In the latency and error data, a clear effect of consistency was observed, with the influence of regularity somewhat weaker. In addition, simu...
| Publicado en: | Memory & Cognition Vol. 28; no. 8; pp. 1269 - 1277 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
December 2000
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=513044346&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 513044346 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0090502X MEG jtl: Memory & Cognition issn: 0090502X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: December 2000 vid: 28 iid: 8 pid: 237 pub: Springer Science & Business Media B.V. artinfo: ui: 513044346 ppf: 1269 ppct: 8 formats: tig: atl: Regularity effects in word naming: what are they? aug: au: Cortese, Michael J. Simpson, Greg B. su: Word recognition English language pronunciation English language Phonemics sug: subj: Word recognition English language pronunciation English language Phonemics ab: In a word-naming experiment, word-body consistency was crossed with grapheme-to-phoneme regularity to test predictions of current models of word recognition. In the latency and error data, a clear effect of consistency was observed, with the influence of regularity somewhat weaker. In addition, simulation data from three contemporary models of word recognition were obtained for the stimuli used in the experiment in order to compare the models' latencies with those of humans. The simulations showed that the human latency data are most consistent with the parallel-distributed-processing model of Plaut, McClelland, Seidenberg, and Patterson (1996), less so with the dual-process model (Zorzi, Houghton, & Butterworth, 1998), and least so with the dual-route-cascaded model (Coltheart & Rastle, 1994). Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|