Articulating structure and agency: how women's studies students express their relationships with feminism.

While “liberal” or “equality” feminism has significant purchase in Australian society, those forms of feminism that identify women's oppression or inequality in terms of structural conditions, be they structures of patriarchy or class, have made less impact at the level of consciousness and policy....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Women's Studies International Forum Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 141 - 157
Autor principal: Bulbeck, Chilla
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Elsevier Science March/April 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=513074815&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 513074815
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02775395
        WSI
      jtl: Women's Studies International Forum
      issn: 02775395
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: March/April 2001
      vid: 24
      iid: 2
      pid: 2410
      pub: Elsevier Science
    artinfo:
      ui:
        513074815
        10.1016/S0277-5395(01)00161-3
      ppf: 141
      ppct: 16
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Articulating structure and agency: how women's studies students express their relationships with feminism.
      aug:
        au: Bulbeck, Chilla
      su:
        Feminism
        Women's studies
        Women college students
        Attitude (Psychology)
        College students
        Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Australia
          Feminism
          Women's studies
          Women college students
          Attitude (Psychology)
          College students
      ab: While “liberal” or “equality” feminism has significant purchase in Australian society, those forms of feminism that identify women's oppression or inequality in terms of structural conditions, be they structures of patriarchy or class, have made less impact at the level of consciousness and policy. The article explores the power of the individualist rhetoric for women's studies students, who, on the whole, reject notions of structural disadvantage in their understanding of feminism and the position of women in society. The students have difficulty articulating the structural constraints that frame women's choices, even after they have spent some months in a women's studies course. The article is based on two sets of original data: a survey of first year women's studies students in 1998, and students' essays in 1999. Copyright (c) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N