Unskilled, unaware, or both? The better-than-average heuristic and statistical regression predict errors in estimates of own performance.

People who score low on a performance test overestimate their own performance relative to others, whereas high scorers slightly underestimate their own performance. J. Kruger and D. Dunning (1999) attributed these asymmetric errors to differences in metacognitive skill. A replication study showed no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Personality & Social Psychology Vol. 82; no. 2; pp. 180 - 189
Autores principales: Krueger, Joachim, Mueller, Ross A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Psychological Association February 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=513129060&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 513129060
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00223514
        JSS
      jtl: Journal of Personality & Social Psychology
      issn: 00223514
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: February 2002
      vid: 82
      iid: 2
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        513129060
        10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.180
      ppf: 180
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Unskilled, unaware, or both? The better-than-average heuristic and statistical regression predict errors in estimates of own performance.
      aug:
        au:
          Krueger, Joachim
          Mueller, Ross A.
      su:
        Ability
        Self-evaluation
        Self-consciousness (Awareness)
      sug:
        subj:
          Ability
          Self-evaluation
          Self-consciousness (Awareness)
      ab: People who score low on a performance test overestimate their own performance relative to others, whereas high scorers slightly underestimate their own performance. J. Kruger and D. Dunning (1999) attributed these asymmetric errors to differences in metacognitive skill. A replication study showed no evidence for mediation effects for any of several candidate variables. Asymmetric errors were expected because of statistical regression and the general better-than-average (BTA) heuristic. Consistent with this parsimonious model, errors were no longer asymmetric when either regression or the BTA effect was statistically removed. In fact, high rather than low performers were more error prone in that they were more likely to neglect their own estimates of the performance of others when predicting how they themselves performed relative to the group. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N