A Dog's Got Personality: A Cross-Species Comparative Approach to Personality Judgments in Dogs and Humans.
This research offers a blueprint for how a cross-species comparative approach can be realized empirically. In a single design, parallel procedures and instruments were used in 2 species, dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans (Homo sapiens), to test whether personality differences exist and can be judge...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Personality & Social Psychology Vol. 85; pp. 1161 - 1170 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
December 2003
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=513156881&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 513156881 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00223514 JSS jtl: Journal of Personality & Social Psychology issn: 00223514 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: December 2003 vid: 85 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 513156881 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1161 ppf: 1161 ppct: 9 formats: tig: atl: A Dog's Got Personality: A Cross-Species Comparative Approach to Personality Judgments in Dogs and Humans. aug: au: Gosling, Samuel D. Kwan, Virginia S. Y. John, Oliver P. su: Dogs -- Behavior Psychology, Comparative Personality sug: subj: Dogs -- Behavior Psychology, Comparative Personality ab: This research offers a blueprint for how a cross-species comparative approach can be realized empirically. In a single design, parallel procedures and instruments were used in 2 species, dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans (Homo sapiens), to test whether personality differences exist and can be judged in dogs as accurately as in humans. Personality judgments of humans and dogs were compared on 3 accuracy criteria: internal consistency, consensus, and correspondence. Results showed that, on all 3 criteria, judgments of dogs were as accurate as judgments of humans. These findings are consistent with the evolutionary continuity hypothesis and suggest an important conclusion not widely considered by either personality or animal researchers: Personality differences do exist and can be measured in animals other than humans. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|